|
          |
     |
| |
- J Vet Sci. 2009 Jun;10(2):121-130 DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2009.10.2.121 |
|
| |
Genetic analysis of ORF5 of recent Korean porcine reproductive and
respiratory syndrome viruses (PRRSVs) in viremic sera collected from MLV-vaccinating or non-vaccinating farms
Hye Kwon Kim1, Jeong Sun Yang3, Hyoung Joon Moon1, Seong Jun Park1, Yuzi Luo1, Chul Seung Lee2, Dae Sub Song2, Bo Kyu Kang2, Soo Kyung Ann1, Chan Hyuk Jun1, Bong Kyun Park1,* |
| |
1Department of Veterinary Medicine Virology Lab, College of Veterinary Medicine and BK21 Program for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
2Research Unit, Green Cross Veterinary Products, Yongin 449-903, Korea
3Center for Infectious Diseases, Korea National Institute of Health, Seoul 122-701, Korea
* parkx026@snu.ac.kr |
| |
The 23 open reading frame (ORF) 5 sequences of Korean
type II porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome
virus (PRRSV) were collected from viremic sera from the
(modified live vaccine) MLV-vaccinating and non-vaccinating
farms from 2007 to 2008. The samples were phylogenetically
analyzed with previous ORF5 sequences, including type I
Korean PRRSV, and previously reported or collected
sequences from 1997 to 2008. A MN184-like subgroup of
type II Korean PRRSV was newly identified in the viremic
sera collected from 2007 to 2008. And of the type I
PRRSVs, one subgroup had 87.2бн88.9% similarity with
the Lelystad virus, showing a close relationship with the
27бн2003 strain of Spain. The maximum parsimony tree of
type II PRRSV from 1997 to 2008 showed that they had
evolved to four lineages, subgroups 1, 2, 3 and 4. Most of
the recently collected type II PRRSVs belonged to
subgroup 4 (48%). The region of three B-cell epitopes and
two T-cell epitopes of ORF5 amino acids sequences was
considerably different from the MLV in subgroups 3 and
4. In conclusion, the existence of type I PRRSV, which was
genetically different from Lelystad virus (Prototype of
type I PRRSV), and heterologous type II PRRSVs of
viremic pigs detected even in the MLV-vaccinating farms
indicated the need for new vaccine approaches for the
control of PRRSV in Korea.
|
|
| |
|