|
          |
     |
| |
- J Vet Sci. 2009 Jun;10(2):131-139 DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2009.10.2.131 |
|
| |
Protection of chicken against very virulent IBDV provided by in ovo priming
with DNA vaccine and boosting with killed vaccine and the adjuvant effects
of plasmid-encoded chicken interleukin-2 and interferon-ャ
Jeong Ho Park, Haan Woo Sung, Byung Il Yoon, Hyuk Moo Kwon* |
| |
Laboratory of Veterinary Microbiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National
University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea
* kwonhm@kangwon.ac.kr |
| |
The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of in ovo
prime-boost vaccination against infectious bursal disease
virus (IBDV) using a DNA vaccine to prime in ovo followed
by a killed-vaccine boost post hatching. In addition, the adjuvant
effects of plasmid-encoded chicken interleukin-2 and chicken
interferon-ャ were tested in conjunction with the vaccine. A
plasmid DNA vaccine (pcDNA-VP243) encoding the VP2,
VP4, and VP3 proteins of the very virulent IBDV (vvIBDV)
SH/92 strain was injected into the amniotic sac alone or in
combination with a plasmid encoding chicken IL-2 (ChIL-2)
or chicken IFN-ャ (ChIFN-ャ) at embryonation day 18, followed
by an intramuscular injection of a commercial killed IBD
vaccine at 1 week of age. The chickens were orally challenged
with the vvIBDV SH/92 strain at 3 weeks of age and observed
for 10 days. In ovo DNA immunization followed by a killedvaccine
boost provided significantly better immunity than
the other options. No mortality was observed in this group
after a challenge with the vvIBDV. The prime-boost strategy
was moderately effective against bursal damage, which
was measured by the bursa weight/body weight ratio, the
presence of IBDV RNA, and the bursal lesion score. In ovo
DNA vaccination with no boost did not provide sufficient
immunity, and the addition of ChIL-2 or ChIFN-ャ did not
enhance protective immunity. In the ConA-induced lymphocyte
proliferation assay of peripheral blood lymphocyte collected
10 days post-challenge, there was greater proliferation
responses in the DNA vaccine plus boost and DNA vaccine
with ChIL-2 plus boost groups compared to the other groups.
These findings suggest that priming with DNA vaccine and
boosting with killed vaccine is an effective strategy for
protecting chickens against vvIBDV.
|
|
| |
|